Report a Debian bug or a bugzilla bug (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org),
and I'll definitely look into it. Please be sure to include the version of
Razor you are using.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:59:41PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> to test this, i saved two spam messages, one with spamassassin reports
> and modifications, the other without (but still detected as spam by
> spamassassin). i then fired up a tcpdump instance to look for any
> network traffic. finally, i fed each message to stdin of spamassassin
> -r in turn, but there was *no* network traffic generated. that's not
> normal, is it? how would i go about localizing the problem?
What version of razor is installed?
What's the output of spamassassin -DP < /tmp/spam ?
>
> and another issue:
>
> root@diamond:/tmp# spamassassin -d < /tmp/spam | head
> From spamassassin@localhost Tue Mar 26 07:00:45 2002
> SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ----------------------
> SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
> SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future, using
> SPAM: the built-in mail filtering support in your mail reader.
> SPAM:
> SPAM: Content analysis details: (26.6 hits, 5 required)
> SPAM: Hit! (1.1 points) BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED
> SPAM: Hit! (1.1 points) BODY: /\${3,}/
> SPAM: Hit! (2 points) BODY: /GUARANTEE/
>
> /tmp/spam contains a spam message after spamassassin went wild on it.
> but after -d processing, the headers are gone and the SPAM report is
> still present...
>
> any thoughts?
Could you include the message?
--
Duncan Findlay
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
