On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:08:07AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Albert Croft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Question 1:
> >What has the performance of spamassassin (particularly the
> > spamc/spamd combination) been like for mailservers handling
> > medium-to-large quantities of in-bound m
> I think the time taken to scan a message vastly outweighs the time
> taken to open up a new connection.
fwiw, the 3-message TCP connection overhead is not a big deal on
a LAN. Reusing a connection a la HTTP keepalive is important
over the net or a WAN, but for spamd it's overkill.
--j.
--
* Albert Croft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Question 1:
>What has the performance of spamassassin (particularly the
> spamc/spamd combination) been like for mailservers handling
> medium-to-large quantities of in-bound mail (i.e., averaging on the
> order of tens of thousands or more emails per d
Two questions, which I hope someone may be able to point me in the
direction of resources for.
Question 1:
What has the performance of spamassassin (particularly the
spamc/spamd combination) been like for mailservers handling
medium-to-large quantities of in-bound mail (i.e., averaging on th
