RE: [SAtalk] false positives since upgrading to 2.11 (1/7)

2002-03-07 Thread Seth H. Bokelman
iences University of Northern Iowa - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Douglas J Hunley Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:13 PM To: Olivier Nicole Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] false positives since upgrading to 2.11 (1/7) Olivier Nicole sp

Re: [SAtalk] false positives since upgrading to 2.11 (1/7)

2002-03-07 Thread Douglas J Hunley
Olivier Nicole spewed electrons into the ether that assembled into: > The reports tells you that the mailing list is sent through a relay > that is known to be used for spam. > > And this is confirmed by a second source, and the two sources maintain > independant databases of relay used by spam. >

Re: [SAtalk] false positives since upgrading to 2.11 (1/7)

2002-03-07 Thread Olivier Nicole
>As you can see from the email attached, this mail got flagged simply because >of 'received via relay' and 'confirmed spam source' >I received the mail from a mailing list. I do *not* want to add the mailing >list address to my whitelist as this mail would have been fine before >upgrading to 2.

[SAtalk] false positives since upgrading to 2.11 (1/7)

2002-03-06 Thread Douglas J Hunley
As you can see from the email attached, this mail got flagged simply because of 'received via relay' and 'confirmed spam source' I received the mail from a mailing list. I do *not* want to add the mailing list address to my whitelist as this mail would have been fine before upgrading to 2.11 -