> >
> >i disabled both and now dont have any problems. spamd badly needs a
> >child timeout setting. and awl and bayes need RDMBS support so each
> >request doesnt have to lock the db's... except on inserts of which
> >row-level locking might be an option.
>
> When you say you "disabled" baye
At 09:39 20/10/2003 -0500, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel M. Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 2:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] child spamds sitting around forever
>
>
> (Runn
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel M. Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 2:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] child spamds sitting around forever
>
>
> (Running 2.60)
> I'm having a problem where s
(Running 2.60)
I'm having a problem where sometimes I end up with dozens of spamds
taking 100% CPU, driving my load average up to 50 or so.
Anyone else see this?
--
Daniel Drucker / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enter
