> > > >i disabled both and now dont have any problems. spamd badly needs a > >child timeout setting. and awl and bayes need RDMBS support so each > >request doesnt have to lock the db's... except on inserts of which > >row-level locking might be an option. > > When you say you "disabled" bayes locking, are you refering to using > 'bayes_learn_to_journal 1' ? >
i didnt say i disabled bayes locking, i said i disabled bayes in general. having learning to journal enabled will allow bayes to lock a much smaller file, and then combine the journal to the _toks once a day (or the limit you specify). this greatly helps with locking issues because you are tie-ing to a much smaller file, which is much faster. on a busy server you can still run into a few problems with it though. AWL was probably the biggest problem out of the two, because it has no expiry feature, and grows uncontrollably. last i looked before shutting it off, mine was sitting at 120mb. tie-ing to that a couple times a second caused big loads and timeouts on my spamc's because the spamd child was sitting there waiting on a lock. Dallas ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
