On November 24, 2003 02:31 pm, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> Hey,
>
> How are people handling the locking issues with Bayes over NFS on a
> high traffic mail server? Currently i have "bayes_learn_to_journal 1
> " turned on, but an sa-learn --rebuild seems to be taking quite some
> time (i have about a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Denenberg writes:
>Hey,
>
> How are people handling the locking issues with Bayes over NFS on a
>high traffic mail server? Currently i have "bayes_learn_to_journal 1
>" turned on, but an sa-learn --rebuild seems to be taking quite some
>time (i
Thanks justin. is there a way to prevent the rebuild (or expire) from
happening on the nfs client side? i would rather script a frequent
rebuild/expire on the nfs server side, and just let the clients do their
thing. I get the following error if a mail has not been seen in a
while, just want to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Denenberg writes:
>Thanks justin. is there a way to prevent the rebuild (or expire) from
>happening on the nfs client side? i would rather script a frequent
>rebuild/expire on the nfs server side, and just let the clients do their
>thing. I ge
Hey,
How are people handling the locking issues with Bayes over NFS on a
high traffic mail server? Currently i have "bayes_learn_to_journal 1
" turned on, but an sa-learn --rebuild seems to be taking quite some
time (i have about a million tokens in my DB).
Has anyone had a better success rate
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
In theory, it's safe. In practice, it's slow and ... ?
In practice, in my case, it's not slow at all -- But NetApps seem to
have a pretty decent NFS implementation. Access to a lot of stuff
(though I haven't clocked Bayes specifically) is often faster than local
disk
>
>On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 10:55, Frederic Goudal wrote:
>
>> >anybody want to put in their $.02 to bayes over NFS.
>>=20
>> I do, it works. Or maybe I don't see the problem.
>
>Among other things, NFS has been known to have file-locking issues. This c=
>an cause problems with multiple processes a
Dan Wilder wrote:
If they're all using totally great NFS implementations with locking that
works and all, you might not get any databases truncated or damaged.
As far as nfs implementations go Sun's(the inventors of nfs) have by far
the best server/client in my opinion. I've used various nfs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
> Our locking code is NFS-safe. However IMO I'd say it's very slow over
> NFS... bayes dbs are *big* and pretty much random-access.
In theory, it's safe. In practice, it's slow and ... ?
Daniel
---
T
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> anybody sharing bayes over NFS, with any issues? I thought i read
> somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS with a netapp filer
> with no probs.
>
> anybody want to put in their $.02 to bayes over NFS.
>
> I am running 2.6 FYI.
Read the fo
Dan Wilder writes:
> If they're all using totally great NFS implementations with locking that
> works and all, you might not get any databases truncated or damaged.
Our locking code is NFS-safe. However IMO I'd say it's very slow
over NFS... bayes dbs are *big* and pretty much random-access.
-
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 02:27:29PM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
> Dan Wilder wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:54:07AM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>I thought i read somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS
> >>>
> >>>
> >>with a netapp filer with no > probs.
> >>
Dan Wilder wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:54:07AM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
I thought i read somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS
with a netapp filer with no > probs.
I'm doing it -- no problems to report.
With things writing to the same db from different hosts
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:54:07AM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
> > I thought i read somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS
> with a netapp filer with no > probs.
>
> I'm doing it -- no problems to report.
With things writing to the same db from different hosts?
--
> I thought i read somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS
with a netapp filer with no > probs.
I'm doing it -- no problems to report.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:55:52PM +0200, Frederic Goudal wrote:
>
>
> >anybody sharing bayes over NFS, with any issues?
>
> Where could be the problem ?
> >I thought i read
> >somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS with a netapp filer
> >with no probs.
>
> What is a netapp filer
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 10:55, Frederic Goudal wrote:
> >anybody want to put in their $.02 to bayes over NFS.
>
> I do, it works. Or maybe I don't see the problem.
Among other things, NFS has been known to have file-locking issues. This can cause
problems with multiple processes accessing the DB
>anybody sharing bayes over NFS, with any issues?
Where could be the problem ?
>I thought i read
>somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS with a netapp filer
>with no probs.
What is a netapp filer ?
>anybody want to put in their $.02 to bayes over NFS.
I do, it works. Or maybe I
anybody sharing bayes over NFS, with any issues? I thought i read
somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS with a netapp filer
with no probs.
anybody want to put in their $.02 to bayes over NFS.
I am running 2.6 FYI.
thanks
adam
-
19 matches
Mail list logo
