Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 January 2004 14:17
> To: Alan Munday
> Subject: RE: [WL] [SAtalk] Yikes.. rules_du_jour
>
>
> On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 20:12, Alan Munday wrote:
> > Chris
> >
>
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Thielen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jay Levitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 3:01 AM
Subject: Re: [WL] [SAtalk] Yikes.. rules_du_jour
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 22:1
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 22:11, Jay Levitt wrote:
> One problem: If a spamassassin --lint fails (because if you, oh, had
> outdated directives in your sa-mimedefang.cf file), then once you correct
> that, on the next run, rules_du_jour won't update anything, because it
> thinks everything is up to dat
Hi,
> Correct. The only set going through frequent revisions right now is
> "Chickenpox". I think I'm about to post a revision on Backhair/Popcorn,
> but that will be the first change in months. Still, they will not go
i've found a major problem with blachhair set today: it catches most of
the
is Thielen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Martin Radford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Charles Gregory"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: [WL] [SAtalk] Yikes.. rules_du_jour
> All, thi
> Hi,
>
> > Correct. The only set going through frequent revisions right now is
> > "Chickenpox". I think I'm about to post a revision on
Backhair/Popcorn,
> > but that will be the first change in months. Still, they will not
go
>
> i've found a major problem with blachhair set today: it catch
Hi,
> Correct. The only set going through frequent revisions right now is
> "Chickenpox". I think I'm about to post a revision on Backhair/Popcorn,
> but that will be the first change in months. Still, they will not go
i've found a major problem with blachhair set today: it catches most of
the
All, this message tried to address most of the comments made regarding
RulesDuJour so far.
On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 12:50, Martin Radford wrote:
> At Sun Jan 18 16:06:13 2004, Charles Gregory wrote:
>
> > A thought, and a suggestion:
> >
> > Thought: Some of the rules in 'rules du jour' look like t
> >
> > My wget client checks for a newer file, or did I miss your point?
>
> wget "cheats". It issues a "HEAD" command, and checks the timestamp.
> If it turns out that it needs the file, then it issues a
> "GET" command for it.
>
> This obviously saves downloading the file multiple times, bu
At Sun Jan 18 20:41:08 2004, Scott Harris wrote:
> > HTTP provides a straightforward way to avoid repeated
> > downloads of a file that hasn't changed, by sending
> > If-Modified-Since requests.
> >
> > Unfortunately wget doesn't yet support this, though it is
> > mentioned in its TODO file.
>
> HTTP provides a straightforward way to avoid repeated
> downloads of a file that hasn't changed, by sending
> If-Modified-Since requests.
>
> Unfortunately wget doesn't yet support this, though it is
> mentioned in its TODO file. (This is with wget 1.9.1, which
> is the current
> ve
At Sun Jan 18 16:06:13 2004, Charles Gregory wrote:
> A thought, and a suggestion:
>
> Thought: Some of the rules in 'rules du jour' look like they are fairly
> 'stable'. There is no reason to be downloading 'backhair' or 'weeds'
> everyday, is there?
>
> Suggestion: For frequent changers, like
(Didn't mean to go offlist with my reply. Here it is again)
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
> > rules_du_jour is kind of neat, but I hope it's not going to drive up
> > Chris & Jennifer's bandwidth bills or som 'em over a quota. :P
>
> A thought, and a suggestion:
>
> Thought: So
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
> rules_du_jour is kind of neat, but I hope it's not going to drive up
> Chris & Jennifer's bandwidth bills or som 'em over a quota. :P
A thought, and a suggestion:
Thought: Some of the rules in 'rules du jour' look like they are fairly
'stable'. Ther
>
> rules_du_jour is kind of neat, but I hope it's not going to drive up
> Chris & Jennifer's bandwidth bills or som 'em over a quota. :P
>
> Would it be possible to add a mirror or two? I've got a fairly empty
T1
> that could help out..
I think mine _should_ be okay, especially if it's staggere
rules_du_jour is kind of neat, but I hope it's not going to drive up
Chris & Jennifer's bandwidth bills or som 'em over a quota. :P
Would it be possible to add a mirror or two? I've got a fairly empty T1
that could help out..
-Jonathan
---
Th
16 matches
Mail list logo