At Sun Jan 18 16:06:13 2004, Charles Gregory wrote:

> A thought, and a suggestion:
> 
> Thought: Some of the rules in 'rules du jour' look like they are fairly
> 'stable'. There is no reason to be downloading 'backhair' or 'weeds'
> everyday, is there?
> 
> Suggestion: For frequent changers, like 'evilrules', how about setting up
> a flag system where, for example, a single file is accessed for a
> timestamp, and only if the timestamp is 'new' does the script perform the
> various downloads. This way, most nights, there is ONE HTTP access, to get
> the timestamp, and its a small file, rather than several big ones.
> 
> This might require a 'central' site to keep the timestamp. But this would
> work for all of Jennifer's rules, at least.....

HTTP provides a straightforward way to avoid repeated downloads of a
file that hasn't changed, by sending If-Modified-Since requests.  

Unfortunately wget doesn't yet support this, though it is mentioned in
its TODO file.  (This is with wget 1.9.1, which is the current
version.) 

Perhaps there's a Perl module that could do this....

Martin
-- 
Martin Radford              |   "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff  -o)
Registered Linux user #9257 |  on ftp and let the rest of the world  /\\
- see http://counter.li.org |       mirror it ;)"  - Linus Torvalds _\_V


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to