On Sunday, November 02, 2003 8:13 PM, Robert Menschel wrote:
> It seems likely that any X-{random string of characters} header is for
> spam tracking purposes only. I wonder whether a test for an X- header
> name with four or five consecutive consonants would be a valid spamsign
> test.
In at lea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Keith,
Thanks, that did it. No immediate benefit, since running that rule
against my 40k corpus it finds just one spam and zero ham, but at least I
have a starting point for analysis.
I was under the impression that Header All would test the c
Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder whether a test for
> an X- header name with four or five consecutive consonants would
> be a valid spamsign test.
>
> Unfortunately, I can't find any way to implement this test. Can
> anyone suggest a method?
Something like this?
header WEI
Received the attached FN today. Most notable attribute I find is that it
includes an X-pvkhgmeblyqcmv header.
It seems likely that any X-{random string of characters} header is for
spam tracking purposes only. I wonder whether a test for an X- header
name with four or five consecutive consonants
