-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Keith,
Thanks, that did it. No immediate benefit, since running that rule
against my 40k corpus it finds just one spam and zero ham, but at least I
have a starting point for analysis.
I was under the impression that Header All would test the contents of the
headers but not the name of the header itself. Apparently I was wrong.
Thanks again.
Bob Menschel
Sunday, November 2, 2003, 6:32:18 PM, you wrote:
KCI> Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I wonder whether a test for
>> an X- header name with four or five consecutive consonants would
>> be a valid spamsign test.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I can't find any way to implement this test. Can
>> anyone suggest a method?
KCI> Something like this?
KCI> header WEIRD_X_HEADER ALL =~ /\nX-[a-
KCI> z]*[bcdfghjklmnpqrstvwxz]{4}[a-z]*: /
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBP6XSAZebK8E4qh1HEQJ83QCcDtQ+H0yTUX9Eg1QXxNHHP6DPe0AAnjLf
bDMqiO0Cr94j3man/jQAn6R1
=Vzdz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
