On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:16:47PM -0600, Michael Moncur wrote:
> Hey, cool. How did your reported spam end up in MySQL? Any chance you can
> share the script that's doing that?
;) I just posted a message about it (under the "high spam score"
thread...) It's just some perl I threw together.
--
> mysql> select COUNT(*) from reported where date > '2002-06-26
> 00:00:00' and rules like
> '%RAZOR_CHECK%';
Hey, cool. How did your reported spam end up in MySQL? Any chance you can
share the script that's doing that?
--
michael moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/
"
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 06:42:15PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> although I seem to recall some questions on the razor list about Razor
> matching anything, and I haven't seen many hits in the past few days,
> but I haven't had any time to investigate, myself :(
Well:
mysql> select COUNT(*) from
Theo Van Dinter said:
> Originally the statement was "Razor2 support is a big change, we
> should wait for 2.4", and now it's "2.4 will take a while, we should
> release 2.32." The semi-software engineer in me says we should leave
> 2.3[1-9] as maintenance releases and wait for 2.40 for R2 supp
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 04:58:27AM -0700, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Is the concensus that Razor2 is stable enough for us to release
> it? I'm somewhat wary of releasing a SA version with Razor2
> support and having to answer daily emails where the answer is
> "upgrade to version 2.x -- prior versi
Is the concensus that Razor2 is stable enough for us to release
it? I'm somewhat wary of releasing a SA version with Razor2
support and having to answer daily emails where the answer is
"upgrade to version 2.x -- prior versions are buggy". In the 2
weeks I was gone, have things settled down
I'm sure we could live with that, too.
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:03:57PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> >
> >>Aaahhh...well, then. Is there any idication of when the current CVS will
> >>be release ready?
> >
> >
> > Good
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:03:57PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
>
>>Aaahhh...well, then. Is there any idication of when the current CVS will
>>be release ready?
>
>
> Good question. I haven't seen anything on the list about a planned 2.40
> release date yet. Hopefully
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:03:57PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> Aaahhh...well, then. Is there any idication of when the current CVS will
> be release ready?
Good question. I haven't seen anything on the list about a planned 2.40
release date yet. Hopefully soon. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagl
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:48:06PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> > Razor Agents 2.08 is what's reporting when I do a razor-check. I believe
> > that's equivalent to Razor2, no?
>
> Yes, that's Razor2, which is currently not supported by a released
> S
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:48:06PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> Razor Agents 2.08 is what's reporting when I do a razor-check. I believe
> that's equivalent to Razor2, no?
Yes, that's Razor2, which is currently not supported by a released
SpamAssassin. (it's available via CVS...) Currently rel
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:27:13PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> > What, if anything, do I need to do to get it to check against the Razor
> > databases, as I'm under the impression that it is supposed to do?
>
> It should just work. What does "spamas
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:27:13PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> What, if anything, do I need to do to get it to check against the Razor
> databases, as I'm under the impression that it is supposed to do?
It should just work. What does "spamassassin -P -D< message" tell you?
Does it say Razor is
I've gone over my spamassassin.cf file, and the entries for razor appear
to be there. I have razor running.
Yet, SA does not appear to be checking against the razor database(s).
In the last batch of spam that SA tagged (at least it's doing its job,
there. ), one of the messages was confirmed
14 matches
Mail list logo
