On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:35:27AM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> Not sure what you might do to fix this, but "rpmbuild -ta" with the bz2 file
> fails because the spec file is looking for the gz file. I suppose the makefile
> that generates the tarballs could include one of two generated spec files
--On Monday, September 22, 2003 10:33 PM -0400 Theo Van Dinter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60.tar.gz
> http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60.tar.bz2
Not sure what you might do to fix this, but "rpmbuild -ta" with the bz2
back in bus. when 2.6 my perl instalation had broken
so i had to reinstall perl
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk
when will it be in cpan
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.ne
My mistake I think. I diff'd the amavisd chroot ruleset
(/var/amavisd/usr/share/spamassassin) from the authoritative
/usr/local/share/spamassasin and saw they were different.
I solved this by refreshing the ruleset in the amavisd chroot from the
set in /usr/local/share/spamaassassin.
I was at fir
I just upgraded from rc5 and did something wrong.
It appears that the BAYES database is not being consulted by
SpamAssassin.
Some mail is not getting scored at all. Other mail gets a higher than
normal score due to not getting BAYES scored. I see no BAYES tags in the
headers at all.
I can read t
SpamAssassin 2.60 is released! SpamAssassin 2.60 is the first major
update of SpamAssassin since February 2003 (when the 2.50 series was
released).
SpamAssassin is a mail filter which uses advanced statistical
and heuristic tests to identify spam (also known as unsolicited
commercial/bulk email).
