It's weighted though for the length of the message. There is/was a bug
with super-short messages where the weights would be really big, and I
recently checked in an attempt at fixing this. Try the latest CVS and
see how it fares. I think probably a good thing to do would be to
manually scan the
Following on from my own message... I've checked the
scores file and the scores for spam phrases look well
out of scale - the lowest is 330 and the highest is about
30,000. This means that the spam phrase score will *always*
be either over 100 or 0 (I'm finding it hits on a lot of non spam
messag
This message came out with a spam phrase score well over 100 (2,198 for 'for
your')
... pushing it over the edge as a false positive. I had another one do
something similar today. It seems
in the latest CVS the spam phrase stuff is broken.
The whole message reads:
I have no idea what he i
