It's weighted though for the length of the message. There is/was a bug with super-short messages where the weights would be really big, and I recently checked in an attempt at fixing this. Try the latest CVS and see how it fares. I think probably a good thing to do would be to manually scan the phrases for things like "for your" which just are begging for false-positives, and eliminate those word pairs.
C On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 10:30, Tony Hoyle wrote: > Following on from my own message... I've checked the > scores file and the scores for spam phrases look well > out of scale - the lowest is 330 and the highest is about > 30,000. This means that the spam phrase score will *always* > be either over 100 or 0 (I'm finding it hits on a lot of non spam > messages though). This puts a minimum score on any message it > doesn't like of 3.6, leading to large numbers of false positives. > > Tony > > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
