The virus scanning mail servers that are in front of this box are
doing RBL and MX checks and tagging messages with X headers. I then
have a couple custom scores in the spamassassin config for these
headers. This was done prior to spamassassin for use with some custom
procmail spam filtering, and
One thing I always do on my MTAs that use DNSBls is only use zone
transfers of blacklists on my DNS server. I currently use 7 DNSBls from
Sendmail, only 2 commercial lists. That brings the total DNS queries for
each message to around 10. Now I don't deal with tons of mail per day,
compared to s
Did you even try to have a huge ass dns caching server on available, or
just not even looking for these features?
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 16:19, Steven Saner wrote:
> I use a dual P-III 1GHz, 1GB RAM. I churn as many as 80,000 messages a
> day through spamassassin using spamc/spamd called from pr
I use a dual P-III 1GHz, 1GB RAM. I churn as many as 80,000 messages a
day through spamassassin using spamc/spamd called from procmail with a
load avg. of 1-2, sometimes spiking higher during a big spam. Sendmail
is the MTA and there is no virus filtering on this box (that happens
before it gets t
> "g" == gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
g> Hi. I'm currently evaluating SpamAssassin for use in filtering /
g> tagging spam, and I'm curious to know how well it performs. That is, on
g> a given bit of hardware, let's say P-III @ 1GHz, 1GB Ram, about how many
g> messages could spam
Hi. I'm currently evaluating SpamAssassin for use in filtering /
tagging spam, and I'm curious to know how well it performs. That is, on
a given bit of hardware, let's say P-III @ 1GHz, 1GB Ram, about how many
messages could spam assassin handle? Any pointers?
Much thanks,
Gabriel Cain.
-
