On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 02:32:08PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote:
> How'd you do this? I though the sql database was only for user
> prefs? I'm interested in using an sql database to track my spam
> effectiveness as well.
Sorry for the late reply, I just found a bunch of mails way back in my SA ma
r.
I only ask because I'm pondering the idea of using Razor2 vs. the time it
takes. It would be a nice option, as not everyone prbly agrees with this
idea.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Loiterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How'd you do this? I though the sql database was only for user
prefs? I'm interested in using an sql database to track my spam
effectiveness as well.
- --j2AXaZ4YhVcLc+PQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Cont
Vivek Khera said:
> I bounce messages scoring above 7.0, but my inbound filter is using
> Razor1 not Razor2. Any spams that make it through to me I test on my
> workstation using Razor2, and inevitably they are listed there. Most
> of the time the Razor2 score will throw it over the 7.0 score.
> "TVD" == Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TVD> Since I'm having another night of not being able to sleep, I naturally
TVD> started pondering how effective the spam blocking I've been doing
TVD> has been.
I bounce messages scoring above 7.0, but my inbound filter is using
Razor1 n
Since I'm having another night of not being able to sleep, I naturally
started pondering how effective the spam blocking I've been doing
has been.
Over the past week or so (actually since 2002-10-21 00:00:00), here's
what I've found:
# total verified spams
mysql> select COUNT(*) from reported wh
