At Sun Aug 3 14:32:12 2003, Daniel Carrera wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 02:14:08PM +0100, Martin Radford wrote:
> > Using SpamAssassin to scan mails on the spamassassin-talk mailing list
> > is a bad idea, since many of the messages there will look more spammy
> > than "normal" mail.
>
>
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 02:14:08PM +0100, Martin Radford wrote:
> Using SpamAssassin to scan mails on the spamassassin-talk mailing list
> is a bad idea, since many of the messages there will look more spammy
> than "normal" mail.
Definitely. Is there a way I can correct that?
I use procmail. I
At Sun Aug 3 13:41:00 2003, Daniel Carrera wrote:
>
> Hi Andrea,
>
> You might be interested to know that my SA picked up your email as spam,
> so apparently it's possible. :)
Using SpamAssassin to scan mails on the spamassassin-talk mailing list
is a bad idea, since many of the messages there
Hi Andrea,
You might be interested to know that my SA picked up your email as spam,
so apparently it's possible. :)
Please post the content analysis form SpamAssassin (it's in the headers
of the email). Please don't post the HTML source because my SA will pick
it up as spam again. Here is th
