At Sun Aug  3 13:41:00 2003, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> 
> Hi Andrea,
> 
> You might be interested to know that my SA picked up your email as spam, 
> so apparently it's possible. :)

Using SpamAssassin to scan mails on the spamassassin-talk mailing list
is a bad idea, since many of the messages there will look more spammy
than "normal" mail. 

> Please post the content analysis form SpamAssassin (it's in the headers 
> of the email).  Please don't post the HTML source because my SA will pick 
> it up as spam again.  Here is the analysis from my SA:
> 
> Content analysis details:   (9.60 points, 5 required)
>      IMPOTENCE          (2.9 points)
>      PENIS_ENLARGE      (1.7 points)
>      PENIS_ENLARGE2     (2.1 points)
>      HTML_10_20         (1.2 points)
>      BAYES_30           (-0.9 points)
       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

... and you'll seriously pollute your Bayes database.  You might well
find your system thinks that the word "penis" is actually a
ham-indicator, rather than being indicative of spam!

I use procmail, and tell it not to bother sending mail to this list to
spamc. 

Martin
-- 
Martin Radford              |   "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff  -o)
Registered Linux user #9257 |  on ftp and let the rest of the world  /\\
- see http://counter.li.org |       mirror it ;)"  - Linus Torvalds _\_V


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to