On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 02:14:08PM +0100, Martin Radford wrote: > Using SpamAssassin to scan mails on the spamassassin-talk mailing list > is a bad idea, since many of the messages there will look more spammy > than "normal" mail.
Definitely. Is there a way I can correct that? I use procmail. I have no idea how it works. > > Content analysis details: (9.60 points, 5 required) > > IMPOTENCE (2.9 points) > > PENIS_ENLARGE (1.7 points) > > PENIS_ENLARGE2 (2.1 points) > > HTML_10_20 (1.2 points) > > BAYES_30 (-0.9 points) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > ... and you'll seriously pollute your Bayes database. You might well > find your system thinks that the word "penis" is actually a > ham-indicator, rather than being indicative of spam! Tell me if I'm wrong. My Bayes database won't be polluted as long as I don't feed messages from this list to SA, right? > I use procmail, and tell it not to bother sending mail to this list to > spamc. Can you tell me how to do that? Thanks. -- Daniel Carrera | PGP: 6643 8C8B 3522 66CB D16C D779 2FDD 7DAC 9AF7 7A88 Math PhD. UMD | http://www.math.umd.edu/~dcarrera/pgp.html * * * * * Weekly Smile * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Sign in a hotel in Athens: Visitors are expected to complain at the office between the hours of 9 and 11 A.M. daily. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
