[SAtalk] Re: Newbie

2003-08-18 Thread Chris Barnes
Bryan Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am new to the spamassassin software and I am needing some > assistance in configuring the spamassassin so that I can have all my > users email accounts filtered. I have been all over the > spamassassin.org site and that seems to not have a lot of > infor

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Newbie

2003-08-14 Thread Thomas Cameron
- Original Message - From: "Chris Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 5:04 PM Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Newbie > > PS, if you start with RedHat 9, I believe the default install will > include SA 2.53. Hey

[SAtalk] Re: Newbie

2003-08-14 Thread Chris Barnes
Jean-Paul Natola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > are 433 celerons w 128 ram good enough, we have a few of them left, > One already has IPCOP, so I thought one for SA then the last one for > SQUID ? For the number of users you mentioned earlier, it should be ok. Although I would bump the memory to

[SAtalk] Re: Newbie

2003-08-14 Thread Chris Barnes
Jean-Paul Natola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now that i have this info, is there any kind of Content filter that > is linux based, if so , > > can it run on the same box as SA? Most of us probably use procmail for this (which is non-trivial to learn, but AWESOMELY powerful). -- + + + + + +

[SAtalk] Re: Newbie - Why no score for equal From: and To: address?

2003-08-10 Thread Chris Barnes
Imho, this gets a low score because it is not uncommon for people to use it for non-spam distributions. For example, my wife sends a "family update" to around 20 or so people in her addressbook. She puts her own email address in the To: line and everyone else in the BCC: (making the To: and From:

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Newbie - Why no score for equal From: and To: address?

2003-08-09 Thread Matt Kettler
At 11:14 AM 8/8/2003 -0500, Chris Barnes wrote: Imho, this gets a low score because it is not uncommon for people to use it for non-spam distributions. For example, my wife sends a "family update" to around 20 or so people in her addressbook. Actually in 2.55 there's only one FROM_AND_TO_SAME and

[SAtalk] Re: Newbie

2003-08-07 Thread Chris Barnes
Jean-Paul Natola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > well I'm to Linux, but I have alot of experience in UNIX HP-UX > 10.2 just that its been a while, but we are non-profit , and all > these firewalls and spam apps are very expensive. we are a small 40 > user org If you're familiar with any variant

[SAtalk] Re: newbie question: subject line not being tagged.....

2002-10-17 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 09:19:59AM -0500, william f guyton jr wrote: > Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by projects by uid 506 with > qmail-scanner-1.14 (spamassassin: 2.42. Clear:SA:1(8.4/5.0):. Processed > in 0.549996 secs); 16 Oct 2002 17:16:19 - > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.4 required=5.0

RE: [SAtalk] RE: newbie help

2002-06-05 Thread Doug Dempsey
] Subject: [SAtalk] RE: newbie help Also, how can I validate if spamassassin is operating correctly. I have the qmail-scanner insert a tag so I know it has been scanned. Is there away to do the same thing with spamassassin? Thanks Doug -Original Message- From: Doug Dempsey [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [SAtalk] RE: newbie help

2002-06-04 Thread David T-G
Doug -- ...and then Doug Dempsey said... % % Also, how can I validate if spamassassin is operating correctly. I have the % qmail-scanner insert a tag so I know it has been scanned. Is there away to % do the same thing with spamassassin? I don't have answers for your first batch of questions, bu

[SAtalk] RE: newbie help

2002-06-04 Thread Doug Dempsey
Also, how can I validate if spamassassin is operating correctly. I have the qmail-scanner insert a tag so I know it has been scanned. Is there away to do the same thing with spamassassin? Thanks Doug -Original Message- From: Doug Dempsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, Jun

[SAtalk] Re: Newbie white list question

2002-04-19 Thread Shane Williams
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Scott Doty wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 03:16:51PM -0700, John Lang wrote: > > Should this work? > > > > whitelist_from*@my-cast.com, *@elitepc.com > > Try > > whitelist_from*@my-cast.com > whitelist_from*@elitepc.com The multiple line version is