At 12:20 AM 1/15/2004, Maxime Ritter wrote:
HABEAS_VIOLATOR doesn't need HABEAS_SWE to be positive ; I have seen some
spams which matched HABEAS_VIOLATOR without been tagged by HABEAS_SWE
Actually, it does. In the check_rbl_swe function, it makes sure the Habeas
mark is present before it even che
Kelson Vibber wrote:
> At 02:09 AM 1/14/2004, Maxime Ritter wrote:
>>I wrote some new habeas rules, which take care of the recents
>>Habeas forgery :
>
> I did something similar, except that instead of redefining the HABEAS_SWE
> rule, I created an offset, and I focused on the URLs rather than the
