[SAtalk] Re: A better alternative to test ROUND_THE_WORLD]

2002-03-03 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, Craig R. Hughes wrote: [...] > It's great to hear that SA is increasingly being viewed as the #1 anti > spam product. In some part I think that's probably due to both its > effectiveness, and its flexibility. The simple fact is that in the > corpus, there are 687 pieces of sp

Re: [SAtalk] Re: A better alternative to test ROUND_THE_WORLD

2002-03-03 Thread Craig R Hughes
wrote: > Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 11:35:48 + > From: David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: A better alternative to test ROUND_THE_WORLD > > On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 09:41:18PM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote: > > &g

[SAtalk] Re: A better alternative to test ROUND_THE_WORLD

2002-03-03 Thread Alan Shutko
Rob McMillin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm curious -- what release are you running that the FARAWAY_CHARSET > rules are disabled? Is this a Debian thing? Yes, it's a Debian thing. The scores for the FARAWAY_CHARSET rules are set to zero in the Debian package. The rules are still there, so

Re: [SAtalk] Re: A better alternative to test ROUND_THE_WORLD

2002-03-03 Thread Rob McMillin
Alan Shutko wrote: >OTOH, the vast majority of spam I get is cjk spam, as is the majority >of spam that gets through spamassassin. I would be quite in favor of >including this test, as the debian package could easily disable it by >default, and users could easily reenable it (as I have done so f

Re: [SAtalk] Re: A better alternative to test ROUND_THE_WORLD

2002-03-03 Thread David Cantrell
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 09:41:18PM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote: > I just need to finish culling false positives from it automatically. And talking of false positives ... I've looked on the site but could find no way of reporting them. Could someone enlighten me? Perhaps some way of submitting

[SAtalk] Re: A better alternative to test ROUND_THE_WORLD

2002-03-03 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Sat, 02 Mar 2002, Rob McMillin wrote: > Daniel Pittman wrote: >>On Sat, 02 Mar 2002, Rob McMillin wrote: >>>Duncan Findlay wrote: On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 09:50:03PM -0800, Rob McMillin wrote: >I would like to suggest that the ROUND_THE_WORLD test, which seems >to catch little r

Re: [SAtalk] Re: A better alternative to test ROUND_THE_WORLD

2002-03-02 Thread Rob McMillin
Daniel Pittman wrote: >On Sat, 02 Mar 2002, Rob McMillin wrote: > >>Duncan Findlay wrote: >> >>>On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 09:50:03PM -0800, Rob McMillin wrote: >>> I would like to suggest that the ROUND_THE_WORLD test, which seems to catch little real spam these days. (Maybe it's just me.)

[SAtalk] Re: A better alternative to test ROUND_THE_WORLD

2002-03-02 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Sat, 02 Mar 2002, Rob McMillin wrote: > Duncan Findlay wrote: >>On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 09:50:03PM -0800, Rob McMillin wrote: >> >>> I would like to suggest that the ROUND_THE_WORLD test, which seems >>> to catch little real spam these days. (Maybe it's just me.) I would >>> submit for the grou

[SAtalk] Re: A better alternative to test ROUND_THE_WORLD

2002-03-02 Thread Alan Shutko
Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Lets try not to discriminate against foreign users. > > One complaint I had with the Debian package was that FARAWAY_CHARSET caught > foreign users participating in the Debian project (often because they wanted > to use 1 special character in their sig