Daniel Pittman wrote:
>On Sat, 02 Mar 2002, Rob McMillin wrote:
>
>>Duncan Findlay wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 09:50:03PM -0800, Rob McMillin wrote:
>>>
>>>>I would like to suggest that the ROUND_THE_WORLD test, which seems
>>>>to catch little real spam these days. (Maybe it's just me.) I would
>>>>submit for the group's slings and arrows, as a better substitute, a
>>>>rule that seems to work well for me:
>>>>
>>>>header FROM_SPAMLAND Received =~
>>>>/\.(?:kr|cn|cl|ar|hk|il|th|tw|sg|za|tr|ma|ua|in|pe)(?:[\s\)\]]|$)/
>>>>describe FROM_SPAMLAND From a country with lots of open relays
>>>>score FROM_SPAMLAND 2
>>>>
>>>>Let the spear-chucking commence!
>>>>
>>>Lets try not to discriminate against foreign users.
>>>
>>I understand your concern about fair play. As the comments for the
>>extant ROUND_THE_WORLD says, sad but true -- sort it out, sysadmins.
>>Once they start actually closing open relays, I'll be happy to reduce
>>the number and/or score of this test. But I think others will find
>>this useful.
>>
>
>I am curious about the score you assigned to it -- did you run the GA
>over your corpus of mail to generate it (and which -- Craig or Justin),
>or is this an arbitrarily assigned score?
>
>It would be interesting to know what the GA thought of the effectiveness
>of the test.
>
I've been using it for a couple weeks now with good success -- no corpus
just yet. I believe there is a publically available one somewhere, n'est
pas?
--
http://www.pricegrabber.com | Dog is my co-pilot.
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
