On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 08:17:57AM -0600, SAtalk Mail User wrote:
> I have a question i regards to razor2 and spamassassin - this is what I see
> from my maillog, I have spamd in debug mode, I am wondering if you can tell me
> if razor is being used. If so how can I tell that razor2 is being utili
Hello all -
I have a question i regards to razor2 and spamassassin - this is what I see
from my maillog, I have spamd in debug mode, I am wondering if you can tell me
if razor is being used. If so how can I tell that razor2 is being utilized.
Jan 8 08:11:08 elmo spamd[4644]: debug: Using resul
Are you running spamd as yourself, or as another user (nobody, or root, or
whatever)? It sounds quite likely that the user your running spamd as doesn't
have a ~/.razor/ set up, but your own user does.
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Mark Norton wrote:
> Any reason why I would get razor results against spam
Any reason why I would get razor results against spamassassin
and none when using the spamc client?
I've been running the spamc client and have not seen
any hits against any of the spam. After replacing spamc with spamassassin the
second message through reported this:
Content analys
Speaking of Razor -- how does one disable Razor checks?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:10 PM
To: Mark R. Cervarich
Cc: spamlist
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Razor and SpamAssassin
Mark R. Cervarich said:
> On
They can also get around the -H by upgrading to Razor 2.20.
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Justin Mason wrote:
>
> Mark R. Cervarich said:
> > On the front page of, http://www.spamassassin.org/ spam-idendification
> > tactics are said to include:
> > * Razor: Vipul's Razor
> >
> > I have Razor r
Mark R. Cervarich said:
> On the front page of, http://www.spamassassin.org/ spam-idendification
> tactics are said to include:
> * Razor: Vipul's Razor
>
> I have Razor running as well as SpamAssassin. Procmail filters
> SpamAssassin caught mail into 1 folder and Razor mail into ano
Actually the only one you will likely see is RAZOR2_CHECK. RAZOR_CHECK is
only called if you have razor v1.x installed, RAZOR2_CHECK is only run if
you have razor 2.x installed. You'll only see both if you've downloaded and
installed both razor 1.x and razor 2.x.
Razor should be called by Spam
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Mark R. Cervarich wrote:
> So, thinking out loud, is Razor not getting used because of the
> systemwide use of SpamAssasin? Or is there some other reason.
I temporarily changed my spamd options to include "-D" and saw these
messages:
Nov 19 15:48:36 ns spamd[16104]: conne
When I try this as myself (a normal user called mark):
cat /root/.cpan/build/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.01/sample-spam.txt | spamc | more
Here are the interesting lines:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=32.1 required=7.0
tests=UNDISC_RECIPS,FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,MSGID_HAS_NO_AT,
SMTPD_IN_RC
Try running the sample spam in the distribution.
cat sample-spam.txt | spamc
A working spamassassin / razor finds sample spam in the razor database, the
RAZOR2_CHECK rule shows up on the sample message over here when I run it.
My question is -- at what point does SpamAssassin use Razor? Becaus
On the front page of, http://www.spamassassin.org/ spam-idendification
tactics are said to include:
* Razor: Vipul's Razor
I have Razor running as well as SpamAssassin. Procmail filters
SpamAssassin caught mail into 1 folder and Razor mail into another
(see snippet of my .procmailr
I installed Razor2 and it appears to be functioning properly. I am and
have been running Spamassassin 2.43 for sometime now. My debug logs
show:
Nov 19 14:55:06 trillian spamd[1037]: debug: Razor2 is available
Nov 19 14:55:06 trillian spamd[1037]: debug: entering helper-app run
mode
Nov 19 14:
> "SWS" == Sunil William Savkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SWS> However, I also remember reading that i need to have an account set up to
SWS> even use razor. But in my case, it would be a pain for every one of my
SWS> users to have a razor account. Is there a way to set up only one accoun
ok.
I am about to download razor2 and install, however, I still wanted some
clarification.
Currently it looks like the razor servers are only used if I actually have
razor client software installed. That is, without it, no go.
Is this correct? I was looking at Dns.pm for this behavior, which
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 04:21:18PM -0400, Sunil William Savkar wrote:
> I guess what i meant is that before the reporting will work, I need to
> have razor's report agents set up and also an account set up, right?
For Razor2, yes. That's a Razor thing.
> Again, you are pointing out that there i
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 03:16:37PM -0400, Sunil William Savkar wrote:
>> However, Spamassassin itself does not have support for reporting spam
>> back to razor.
>
> Sure it does.
I guess what i meant is that before the reporting will work, I need to
have razor's report agents set up and also an
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 03:16:37PM -0400, Sunil William Savkar wrote:
> However, Spamassassin itself does not have support for reporting spam back
> to razor.
Sure it does.
> Thus, if I just want the benefits of the razor blacklists, I am set. If I
> want to start to contribute, then I need to
I think I am missing the boat and would like to see if I have things right
now...
Spamassassin 2.41 automatically checks lists, including razor and razor2
without any tweeks at all.
However, Spamassassin itself does not have support for reporting spam back
to razor.
Thus, if I just want the ben
19 matches
Mail list logo
