RE: [SAtalk] Postfix and spamc - call by shell or Procmail

2003-09-19 Thread Larry Gilson
> -Original Message- > From: Alex van den Bogaerdt > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 12:42:15AM -0400, Larry Gilson wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > > > in master.cf: > > > > > > spamc unix- n n - - > pipe > > > flags=Fq > > > user=spamcheck

Re: [SAtalk] Postfix and spamc - call by shell or Procmail

2003-09-19 Thread Alex van den Bogaerdt
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 12:42:15AM -0400, Larry Gilson wrote: > Hi Alex, > > in master.cf: > > > > spamc unix- n n - - pipe > > flags=Fq > > user=spamcheck > > argv=/usr/bin/spamc -x -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -i -f > > $sender $reci

RE: [SAtalk] Postfix and spamc - call by shell or Procmail

2003-09-17 Thread Larry Gilson
Hi Alex, > -Original Message- > From: Alex van den Bogaerdt > I once tried to find out what the big need was to do it either way. > > May I present a third (or is it: a second?) alternative: > > in master.cf: > > spamc unix- n n - - pipe >

RE: [SAtalk] Postfix and spamc - call by shell or Procmail

2003-09-17 Thread Larry Gilson
Thanks to all who answered! Your perspectives are greatly appreciated! Regards, Larry --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin

Re: [SAtalk] Postfix and spamc - call by shell or Procmail

2003-09-17 Thread Alex van den Bogaerdt
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 04:02:11PM -0400, Larry Gilson wrote: > I have been trying to understand the advantages and disadvantages of using > the shell script method (like that employed by SecuritySage) and the > Procmail method as a content_filter for Postfix. Can someone lend an expert > opinion

Re: [SAtalk] Postfix and spamc - call by shell or Procmail

2003-09-17 Thread Jim
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 04:02:11PM -0400, Larry Gilson wrote: > I have been trying to understand the advantages and disadvantages of using > the shell script method (like that employed by SecuritySage) and the > Procmail method as a content_filter for Postfix. Can someone lend an expert > opinion?

Re: [SAtalk] Postfix and spamc - call by shell or Procmail

2003-09-17 Thread Nigel Wilkinson
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:02:11 -0400 Larry Gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have been trying to understand the advantages and disadvantages of > using the shell script method (like that employed by SecuritySage) and > the Procmail method as a content_filter for Postfix. Can someone lend > a

Re: [SAtalk] Postfix and spamc - call by shell or Procmail

2003-09-17 Thread Creede Lambard
I use a homemade filter chain based on the Perl Mail::Audit package. The advantage is, if you know Perl, it's much easier to set up and maintain than Procmail. The disadvantage is, if you don't know Perl you probably can't use it. Oh yeah, and running it means you have to deal with whatever overh

[SAtalk] Postfix and spamc - call by shell or Procmail

2003-09-17 Thread Larry Gilson
Hi All, I have been trying to understand the advantages and disadvantages of using the shell script method (like that employed by SecuritySage) and the Procmail method as a content_filter for Postfix. Can someone lend an expert opinion? Does anyone feel that one method is more flexible than anot