Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 11:45:21PM +0200, Klaus Heinz wrote:
> > Both messages already contained the repeated Content-Type lines before I
> > got them from my inbox on the mail server.
>
> Hmmm. Returns semi-instantaneously for me on 2.41. Gets a nice
> score too. Thi
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 11:45:21PM +0200, Klaus Heinz wrote:
> I also got two of those messages and wondered whether this might be a
> bug in SA. Fortunately, I can look at the original messages.
> Both messages already contained the repeated Content-Type lines before I
> got them from my inbox on
Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> The problem is that I don't have a copy of the "virgin" (read "original")
> message at the time it was received by Exim. I only have the "mangled" version
I also got two of those messages and wondered whether this might be a
bug in SA. Fortunately, I can look at the or
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 09:10:31PM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> The problem is that I don't have a copy of the "virgin" (read "original")
> message at the time it was received by Exim. I only have the "mangled" version
> after processing with SA.
Define "mangled"? It should only have some
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:00:35 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 08:54:16PM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
>> No, I fear I didn't file a bug because I'm not even sure it's a bug on SA=
>'s=20
>> side. I was hoping that someone could comment on whether this appears to =
>be a SA
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 08:54:16PM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> No, I fear I didn't file a bug because I'm not even sure it's a bug on SA's
> side. I was hoping that someone could comment on whether this appears to be a SA
> bug or a bug on the sender's side...
Well, if SA is taking a long
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:07:32 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 10:42:05AM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
>> could you please try to verify whether the following potential bug in SA =
>2.40-
>> cvs is still present in current versions?
>
>Is there a bug filed about this? Did
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 10:42:05AM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> could you please try to verify whether the following potential bug in SA 2.40-
> cvs is still present in current versions?
Is there a bug filed about this? Did you attach the message to the bug?
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Hi guys,
could you please try to verify whether the following potential bug in SA 2.40-
cvs is still present in current versions?
I received the following e-mail message and noticed dozens of 'charset="US-
ASCII"' headers in the *body* of the message. Upon further inspection I
noticed that the
