On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:00:35 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: >On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 08:54:16PM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: >> No, I fear I didn't file a bug because I'm not even sure it's a bug on SA= >'s=20 >> side. I was hoping that someone could comment on whether this appears to = >be a SA=20 >> bug or a bug on the sender's side... > >Well, if SA is taking a long time (it's subjective, but much longer >than usual...) I would file a bug about it. Before doing that, I would >just run the message through "spamassassin -D -L" and see what happens.
The problem is that I don't have a copy of the "virgin" (read "original") message at the time it was received by Exim. I only have the "mangled" version after processing with SA. So it seems I'm out of luck?! -- L I N U X .~. The Choice /V\ of a GNU /( )\ Generation ^^-^^ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
