At 7/28/03 06:31 PM , Robert Menschel wrote:
KM> I had the same problem with Bayes... eventually, I just turned it
off.
Do you have any idea why the two of you have had this problem? I've been
running OK with SA and Bayes on three different servers, and I've never
intentionally or manually wiped or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Kai,
Monday, July 28, 2003, 10:09:00 AM, you wrote:
KM> At 7/28/03 05:21 AM , Tony Hoyle wrote:
>>
>>I wipe the bayes db every couple of weeks to avoid this (over time
>>it starts giving more and more FNs). I wiped it again just after
>>sendin
At 13:21 28/07/2003 +0100, Tony Hoyle wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Kai MacTane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 July 2003 17:34
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Oops... running 2.60
>
>
> Actually, I doubt those BAYES_00 hits are doing you
At 7/28/03 05:21 AM , Tony Hoyle wrote:
I wipe the bayes db every couple of weeks to avoid this (over time
it starts giving more and more FNs). I wiped it again just after
sending the message, so it'll take a little while before the BAYES_00
creeps back again.
I had the same problem with Bayes...
> -Original Message-
> From: Kai MacTane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 July 2003 17:34
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Oops... running 2.60
>
>
> Actually, I doubt those BAYES_00 hits are doing you much
> good, either. If
> messages
At Fri Jul 25 16:42:09 2003, Tony Hoyle wrote: [reformatted]
> I've found 2.60 is a generaly bit better than 2.55, but recently the
> spammers have worked around it... I now get about a couple of dozen
> spams a day coming in with ridiculously low scores (<2, usually) -
> they're heavily exploitin
At 7/25/03 08:42 AM , Tony Hoyle wrote:
I've found 2.60 is a generaly bit better than 2.55, but recently the
spammers have worked around it... I now get about a couple of dozen spams
a day coming in with ridiculously low scores (<2, usually) - they're
heavily exploiting the low scoring HTML_IMAG
> -Original Message-
> From: Colin Henein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 July 2003 17:32
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Oops... running 2.60
>
>
> Greetings all,
>
> I've been running 2.60 for several months (must have pick
Greetings all,
I've been running 2.60 for several months (must have picked the wrong
download back there somewhere).
I haven't been having any problems, but I wanted to know if I'd be
getting better filtering with 2.55. Not sure how the rule tuning
works, and whether I'm better off with the 2.60
