At Fri Jul 25 16:42:09 2003, Tony Hoyle wrote: [reformatted] > I've found 2.60 is a generaly bit better than 2.55, but recently the > spammers have worked around it... I now get about a couple of dozen > spams a day coming in with ridiculously low scores (<2, usually) - > they're heavily exploiting the low scoring HTML_IMAGE_ONLY rules* > > I'd expect 2.55 will have been so thoroughly worked around now as to > be nearly useless, if 2.60 is being beaten so quickly..
Correct me if I'm wrong, but: (1) 2.60 is still a CVS version - it has not been released. (2) Only one set of mass-checks has been done, so the scoring for 2.60 has not been done yet. Once those have been done, there may well be significant differences in the scores received by any given mail. Martin -- Martin Radford | "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff -o) Registered Linux user #9257 | on ftp and let the rest of the world /\\ - see http://counter.li.org | mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds _\_V ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
