On 16 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 13:51, Charlie Watts wrote:
> > Then again, tools like the DNS blacklists and Razor can bring that number
> > up a bit.
>
> These do push false negatives, but they also increase false-positives,
> depending on which RBLs you use. I run
On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 13:51, Charlie Watts wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Mike Grau wrote:
>
> > My question is - is SpammAssassin ready "out of the box" to
> > differentiate between spam and non-spam "99.94%" of the cases or do I
> > need customized rules. The reason I ask is because I sent mysel
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Mike Grau wrote:
> My question is - is SpammAssassin ready "out of the box" to
> differentiate between spam and non-spam "99.94%" of the cases or do I
> need customized rules. The reason I ask is because I sent myself obvious
> spam (free mortgage quote) and could only get a
Hello.
I just installed SpamAssasin for the first time and have
installed the Spamass-Milter with Sendmail 8.12.2. All
seems to be working:
415 ? S 0:00 sendmail: accepting connections
427 ? S 0:00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:15:00 for
/var/spool/clientmqueue
460 ? S 0:00 /usr/local/bin/s
