On 16 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote: > On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 13:51, Charlie Watts wrote: > > Then again, tools like the DNS blacklists and Razor can bring that number > > up a bit. > > These do push false negatives, but they also increase false-positives, > depending on which RBLs you use. I run with -L and am exceedingly happy > with the results.
Other folks here like Razor quite a bit, but Craig and I both seem to dislike it - not the idea, but the implementation and speed. That, plus DNS blacklists, plus things like the "no MX for sender domain" checks, can slow SpamAssassin down quite a bit. It all depends on the application - I'm using it at an ISP, and use the MX checks plus a few blacklists. Razor is too slow (and used to be unreliable, but I think that is fixed) for me. Other folks (particularly lower-volume places) leave all of the checks on. If you need lots of speed, run with -L. -- Charlie Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frontier Internet, Inc. http://www.frontier.net/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
