Re: [SAtalk] New SA Install

2003-01-13 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:51:41 -0500: > debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule RCVD_IN_DSBL ==> got hit > I checked this again. Yeah, it shows, but only if there is a hit. When I did my first debug tests all of them didn't show such a line (because there were no hits). Kai

Re: [SAtalk] New SA Install

2003-01-12 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:31:39PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > I haven't seen SA 2.43 output any "run_rbl_eval_test" lines with the > -D switch although it was surely doing rbl-tests (given the delay and > the fact that it was running with default settings, oh, and the rules > it scored, of cou

Re: [SAtalk] New SA Install

2003-01-12 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:02:44 -0500: > > > run_rbl_eval_test > > > > Not in 2.43, correct? > > I'm not sure of your question. My message was about 2.43, so yes? > I haven't seen SA 2.43 output any "run_rbl_eval_test" lines with the -D switch although it was surely doing r

Re: [SAtalk] New SA Install

2003-01-12 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 05:31:38PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > run_rbl_eval_test > > Not in 2.43, correct? I'm not sure of your question. My message was about 2.43, so yes? -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "One of my youngest employees once said `How does it feel managing someone young enoug

Re: [SAtalk] New SA Install

2003-01-11 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:56:35 -0500: > run_rbl_eval_test > Not in 2.43, correct? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org

Re: [SAtalk] New SA Install

2003-01-10 Thread Mike Vanecek
Theo, please ignore my previous reply. Thank you for your help. -- Original Message --- From: Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Mike Vanecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:56:35 -0500 Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New SA Install > On Fri, Jan 10, 200

Re: [SAtalk] New SA Install

2003-01-10 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:26:28PM -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote: > (2) I turned on the rbl checks to see what would happen (I do not subscribe > to any of them, individual user). How can I tell if spamd is actually > checking the lists? Look at the debug output from "spamassassin -D". It'll tell

[SAtalk] New SA Install

2003-01-10 Thread Mike Vanecek
I have recently installed version 2.43 SA using spamd and have a couple of questions. I tried to search the archives, but they went down just as I was starting... My local.cf settings are: required_hits 5 version_tag mtvrules1 # append my info to the version rewrite_subject 1 #