RE: [SAtalk] Mailing lists and compliance verbage

2003-12-19 Thread Scott Harris
> > > > > This block of text has been going around for nearly 3-4 years > or more. It's not the same spam law that recently got signed > for the US. > The legit mailer using this SHOULD NOT be using this text. > > > > As a point of clarification, I thought it would be useful for people t

Re: [SAtalk] Mailing lists and compliance verbage

2003-12-19 Thread Evan Platt
--On Friday, December 19, 2003 11:01 AM -0800 Scott Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a user who subscribes to a few mailing lists and they have > recently started adding the following disclosure to the emails they > send: > > *** > > This

Re: [SAtalk] Mailing lists and compliance verbage

2003-12-19 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Justin Mason wrote: > S877 is the CAN-SPAM act. One of the interesting provisions of CAN-SPAM is that it distinguishes "commercial" email, but does not distinguish "bulk" email. That means that even single email messages between private parties must comply with the CAN-SPAM

Re: [SAtalk] Mailing lists and compliance verbage

2003-12-19 Thread Fred
Scott Harris wrote: > > As a point of clarification, I thought it would be useful for people > to know the source of this. Most everyone is pointing out that this > block of text references an old bill that never passed. > > This is from the sys-con.com mailing list people. They are emailing > th

RE: [SAtalk] Mailing lists and compliance verbage

2003-12-19 Thread Scott Harris
> > > > > This block of text has been going around for nearly 3-4 years or more. > It's not the same spam law that recently got signed for the US. > The legit mailer using this SHOULD NOT be using this text. > > > > As a point of clarification, I thought it would be useful for people to k

Re: [SAtalk] Mailing lists and compliance verbage

2003-12-19 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Scott Harris writes: > Also, what are the potential future ramifications for SA as more and more > legit mailing list emailers start adding such verbage to demonstrate their > legitimacy? They might want to look up the law; S1618 was never passed.

Re: [SAtalk] Mailing lists and compliance verbage

2003-12-19 Thread Douglas Kirkland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 19 December 2003 11:01, Scott Harris wrote: > *** > > This message is sent in compliance of the new email bill section 301. Under > Bill S. 1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th US Congress. This

Re: [SAtalk] Mailing lists and compliance verbage

2003-12-19 Thread Fred
Scott Harris wrote: > I wanted to stir up some conversation about spam laws, disclosure > and bulk emails/mailing lists. > > I have a user who subscribes to a few mailing lists and they have > recently started adding the following disclosure to the emails they > send: > > *

[SAtalk] Mailing lists and compliance verbage

2003-12-19 Thread Scott Harris
I wanted to stir up some conversation about spam laws, disclosure and bulk emails/mailing lists. I have a user who subscribes to a few mailing lists and they have recently started adding the following disclosure to the emails they send: *** This me