-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Scott Harris writes: > Also, what are the potential future ramifications for SA as more and more > legit mailing list emailers start adding such verbage to demonstrate their > legitimacy? They might want to look up the law; S1618 was never passed. *THAT* is why it makes a good spam test, because only spammers seem to talk about nonexistent laws like this and HR3113 ;) I'm betting they found that text on a web site somewhere. See http://www.cdmcss.com/Resources/Web_info/General_Web_Info/spam.shtml S877 is the CAN-SPAM act. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQE/41MvQTcbUG5Y7woRArwFAKCmN9iWYJorKpM1OTy3Sa87ZIHVOwCgzGNW +SIFw3SbRpFDmLvOLmYHPVo= =NoSZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
