At 04:26 PM 9/25/03 -0400, Dominic Germain wrote:
I just set up a new server with SA 2.60. It's almost the same setup I
already done on my "real" server. There is 2 differences: I use SA 2.60
instead of 2.55 and I use Perl 5.6.0 instead of 5.8.0... I can't figure
why SA 2.6 ignore my /etc/mai
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 19:35, Javier Henderson wrote:
> * Dominic Germain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030925 17:34]:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I just set up a new server with SA 2.60. It's almost the same setup I
> > already done on my "real" server. There is 2 differences: I use SA
> > 2.60 instead of 2.5
* Dominic Germain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030925 17:34]:
> Hi,
>
>
> I just set up a new server with SA 2.60. It's almost the same setup I
> already done on my "real" server. There is 2 differences: I use SA
> 2.60 instead of 2.55 and I use Perl 5.6.0 instead of 5.8.0... I can't
> figure why S
SA 2.6 uses /perl/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
It's in the docs and if you use -D (for debug) it will tell you where it's
looking.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Dominic Germain wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I just set up a new server with SA 2.60. It's almost the same setup
Hi,
I just set up a new server with SA 2.60. It's almost the same setup I
already done on my "real" server. There is 2 differences: I use SA
2.60 instead of 2.55 and I use Perl 5.6.0 instead of 5.8.0... I can't
figure why SA 2.6 ignore my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file...
There is NO
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Chris Tatro wrote:
> Can anyone please help me on this?
I presume you've run "spamassassin -D --lint" ?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
Using
redhat 9.0
amavisd-new-20030616
Postfix version 1.1.12
spamassassin 2.55
I am having a strang problem with what appears to be that
my locall.cf file
is not being read.
When i set a user to recive all incoming mail with the
all_spam_to setting
and restart amavisd the user will recive all spa
I'm running 2.55 as spamd (rather than standalone)...I just noticed
that my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf doesn't seem to be having any
effect on my incoming mail. I've got
score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 15.0
score RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM 0.00
score X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY0.00
score X_OSIRU_D
here's part of my local.cf file -
rawtext MSCUST6a /latest version of security update/i
describe MSCUST6a another MS worm
score MSCUST6a 5
full MSCUST6 /latest version of security update/i
describe MSCUST6 msjunk
score MSCUST6 5
and here's an except of the message that's getting thru with
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Michael W. Cocke wrote:
> here's part of my local.cf file -
>
> rawtext MSCUST6a /latest version of security update/i
> describe MSCUST6a another MS worm
> score MSCUST6a 5
>
> full MSCUST6 /latest version of security update/i
> describe MSCUST6 msjunk
> score MSCUST6 5
>
> an
here's part of my local.cf file -
rawtext MSCUST6a /latest version of security update/i
describe MSCUST6a another MS worm
score MSCUST6a 5
full MSCUST6 /latest version of security update/i
describe MSCUST6 msjunk
score MSCUST6 5
and here's an except of the message that's getting thru with
here's part of my local.cf file -
rawtext MSCUST6a /latest version of security update/i
describe MSCUST6a another MS worm
score MSCUST6a 5
full MSCUST6 /latest version of security update/i
describe MSCUST6 msjunk
score MSCUST6 5
and here's an except of the message that's getting thru with
here's part of my local.cf file -
rawtext MSCUST6a /latest version of security update/i
describe MSCUST6a another MS worm
score MSCUST6a 5
full MSCUST6 /latest version of security update/i
describe MSCUST6 msjunk
score MSCUST6 5
and here's an except of the message that's getting thru with
Covington, Chris wrote:
I'm running SA 2.55 on two RH 9 servers each with Postfix 2.0.13 and
amavisd-new (20030616) installed in default locations. Though SA is
running great with its default settings, it seems that the local.cf file
in /etc/mail/spamassassin isn't being used (IE it's ignored), t
Hi all,
I'm running SA 2.55 on two RH 9 servers each with Postfix 2.0.13 and
amavisd-new (20030616) installed in default locations. Though SA is
running great with its default settings, it seems that the local.cf file
in /etc/mail/spamassassin isn't being used (IE it's ignored), though it
has 644
At 04:11 AM 7/3/2003 +0200, Andrea Riela wrote:
Hi folks,
I've problem with spamassassin 2.5x and local.cf on OpenBSD 3.3.
I would see X-Spam-Report in the headers, but I can't.
Report_header 1 doesn't work.
Why? How could I see that?
report_header is no longer a valid snort option. Read the curre
Hi folks,
I've problem with spamassassin 2.5x and local.cf on OpenBSD 3.3.
I would see X-Spam-Report in the headers, but I can't.
Report_header 1 doesn't work.
Why? How could I see that?
Another question: how could I filter spam with "
Hello!
I'm running SpamAssassin via amavisd-new on a Postfix/FreeBSD mail
server (all software installed from FreeBSD ports). SA version is 2.53,
which is the one that has big negative score for MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE test
in it's default settings. To work around it, I added this line to
/usr/loca
Catherine Pinatiello wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:36:15AM -0700, Catherine Pinatiello wrote:
I have another server setup to use Spamassassin with the same
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and it works just fine. What things
should I check besides local.cf in this inst
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:36:15AM -0700, Catherine Pinatiello wrote:
I have another server setup to use Spamassassin with the same
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and it works just fine. What things
should I check besides local.cf in this instance?
Did you restart spamd
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:36:15AM -0700, Catherine Pinatiello wrote:
> I have another server setup to use Spamassassin with the same
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and it works just fine. What things
> should I check besides local.cf in this instance?
Did you restart spamd?
--
Randomly Gen
Ok I modified my local.cf to include:
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag *SPAM*
So it will change the subject of all incoming spam...
It is not doing so. They are still being encapsulated as attachments to
the report, and everything else seems to be smooth, but the subject
ember 08, 2002 8:08 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] local.cf doesnt seem to work
Hi
I have put
blacklist_from *hotmail.com
in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
yet mail from hotmail.com isnt marked as spam? how can this be?
Thomas
---
This sf.net email is
Can you provide an example of an e-mail that got through, with all the
headers?
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
| Thomas Nyman
| Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:09 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: [SAtalk] local.cf doesnt seem
Hi
I have put
blacklist_from *hotmail.com
in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
yet mail from hotmail.com isnt marked as spam? how can this be?
Thomas
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power & Col
I have set up SA on a RedHat 7.3 server running spamc/spamd via Postfix
using a hacked up version of the Anomy filter.sh script at:
http://www.advosys.ca/papers/postfix-filtering.html
Basically I didn't like the Anomy defanger, so I stripped that part out the
the filter.sh and changed it so it wou
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 03:57:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to block all messages with VIAGRA, FREE, SEX, PORN, etc in the subject of a
>message. I would set the score to a very high value.
>
> How would I define the syntax in the local.cf file? Would the score also be in the
>lo
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 07:16:10PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Would I add the rule to the local.cf file or spamassassin.cf file and put the score
>as well in the local.cf file?
I've seen recently where there seems to be some confusion on how SA
deals with config files:
- Read all
Posté par Damian Mendoza le 25/10.
What if I wanted to block specific subject keywords that are not already defined as a
spamassassin rule?
>> you can specify your own rule ... that is what rox in SA. its user configurable!
Would I add the rule to the local.cf file or spamassassin.cf file and
: Brad Reichert [mailto:breicher@;chesaning.k12.mi.us]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] local.cf
Would anyone with a well defined local.cf file be willing to share with me? I'm just
getting started with Spam Assassin and only blocking about 6% of my
I've balanced mine by setting required_hits to 4, and using
whitelist_from to make sure I get mail from others that might be
generating a false positive.
Paul
Brad Reichert wrote:
Would anyone with a well defined local.cf file be willing to share with me? I'm just getting started with Spam Ass
Would anyone with a well defined local.cf file be willing to share with me? I'm just
getting started with Spam Assassin and only blocking about 6% of my messages. I'm
sure the percentage that is spam is higher. I tried lowering the score required but
then started blocking mail that wasn't spam
Hello,
> SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results
> -- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original
> message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar
> unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for
> more details. SPAM
Posté par Damian Mendoza le 25/10.
Hi,
I want to block all messages with VIAGRA, FREE, SEX, PORN, etc in the subject of a
message. I would set the score to a very high value.
How would I define the syntax in the local.cf file? Would the score also be in the
local.cf file?
>> for sitewide impl
Hi,
I want to block all messages with VIAGRA, FREE, SEX, PORN, etc in the subject of a
message. I would set the score to a very high value.
How would I define the syntax in the local.cf file? Would the score also be in the
local.cf file?
Thanks,
Damian Mendoza
Workgroup Solutions
-
I'm having a problem after having upgraded to 2.41 with my latest Debian
testing update. It seems like whitelist entries in local.cf may not be
honored in certain circumstances.
I have an entry in /etc/spamassassin/local.cf:
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But then I'm getting messages like
Any one has a good sample for local.cf?
---
Sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology!
Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer
Symposium. Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/develop
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:54:07PM +0200, Sweethome.co.il Webmaster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First, funny thing happened today, I got the Digest flagged as spam
> (8.2/6.8)
>
> I have spamd installed with spamproxyd on a Postfix machine.
> I think my /etc/mail/spamassasin/local.cf file is not parsed, a
Hi,
First, funny thing happened today, I got the Digest flagged as spam (8.2/6.8)
I have spamd installed with spamproxyd on a Postfix machine.
I think my /etc/mail/spamassasin/local.cf file is not parsed, at least some
rules..
I'm not using procmail and don't need per/user prefs.
Is there anot
MAIL PROTECTED]>
KGJ> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KGJ> Subject: [SAtalk] Local.cf
KGJ>
KGJ> When I modify my local.cf file in /etc/mail/spamassassin (ie, for
KGJ> whitelisting addresses), do I need to restart spamd ? Thanks.
KGJ>
KGJ>
KGJ> _
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Craig R. Hughes stated:
> Uhoh, since when did they start using the 80.0.0.0 netblock? Your email was
> slamming against my firewall for the last 2 days...
>
> C
>
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from s1.uklinux
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:05:21PM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Uhoh, since when did they start using the 80.0.0.0 netblock? Your email was
> slamming against my firewall for the last 2 days...
Be wary of blocking networks because they're listed as "unassigned".
I found a firewall at a client
Uhoh, since when did they start using the 80.0.0.0 netblock? Your email was
slamming against my firewall for the last 2 days...
C
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from s1.uklinux.net (mail.uklinux.net [80.84.72.21])
by belphegore.hughes-family.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Craig R. Hughes spake thusly:
> ls -ld /etc/mail/spamassassin? And what uid is spamd running as?
>
sean@bsod:~ > ls -ld /etc/mail/spamassassin
drwxr-xr-x 2 exim exim 84 Apr 5 10:28
/etc/mail/spamassassin
sean@bs
ls -ld /etc/mail/spamassassin? And what uid is spamd running as?
C
Sean Rima wrote:
> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 18:51:08 +0100
> From: Sean Rima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] local.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin not being checked
>
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes outgrape:
> ls -l /etc/mail/spamassassin ?
>
sean@bsod:~ > ls -l /etc/mail/spamassassin/
total 8
- -rwx-- 1 exim exim 848 Apr 5 10:28 local.cf
- -rwx-- 1 root root 631 Apr 5 10:24
ls -l /etc/mail/spamassassin ?
C
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 01:56, Sean Rima wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes told this:
>
> > What does spamassassin -D say?
> >
>
>
> debug: using "/usr/share/spamassassin" for default rules dir
> debug: u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes told this:
> What does spamassassin -D say?
>
debug: using "/usr/share/spamassassin" for default rules dir
debug: using "/etc/mail/spamassassin" for site rules dir
debug: using "/home/sean/.spamassassin" for user state
What does spamassassin -D say?
C
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 15:44, Sean Rima wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I am using the current CVS and have my local.cf with all my
> whitelist_from lines in /etc/mail/spamassassin but this is not being
> checked. Once I moved it to /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am using the current CVS and have my local.cf with all my
whitelist_from lines in /etc/mail/spamassassin but this is not being
checked. Once I moved it to /var/share/spamassassin it was
used. According to the man any local.cf in the var dir will be
50 matches
Mail list logo
