Charles Gregory wrote:
There is nothing technically 'magical' about the Habeas headers. They
could simply be faked. Habeas Corp says that they make use of copyright
laws to pursue legal action against spammers
Which they have already done, successfully:
http://habeas.com/companyPressPR.html
but
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Jeremy Kister wrote:
> It seems that spamassassin 2.60 requires all 9 Habeas fields to be included,
> in order, in the header of an email, for it to recognize the Habeas mark.
I'm just a little curious. There is nothing technically 'magical' about
the Habeas headers. They could
At 01:27 AM 12/9/03 -0500, Jeremy Kister wrote:
It seems that spamassassin 2.60 requires all 9 Habeas fields to be included,
in order, in the header of an email, for it to recognize the Habeas mark.
While contacting Habeas support about a semi-related issue, I was informed
that spamassassin should
It seems that spamassassin 2.60 requires all 9 Habeas fields to be included,
in order, in the header of an email, for it to recognize the Habeas mark.
While contacting Habeas support about a semi-related issue, I was informed
that spamassassin should only be testing for 'X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habea
