Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thanks, but at the moment it seems cvs distro is having a problem or
either something on my end?
cd spamassassin
make
[...]
---
t/spamd_stop.t21 50.00% 2
No, it's worked out now, and fully operational in CVS.
C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There's a rule for that now in CVS. Any repeated word in all caps which is 3 or
> > more letter long will trigger.
>
> That particular one turned out to be probl
Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's a rule for that now in CVS. Any repeated word in all caps which is 3 or
> more letter long will trigger.
That particular one turned out to be problematic and is being
debugged still I think. But I get the idea, none the less.
__
Harry Putnam wrote:
HP> Probably should go back to default, and see what I observe. The
HP> first time around a message with FREE FREE in the subject and
HP> several times in the body came thru, it may have been a fluke.
There's a rule for that now in CVS. Any repeated word in all caps which
Bart Schaefer wrote:
BS> Hrm. This was reported once before, and I thought the description had
BS> been updated then. Sorry, I should have checked.
Ok, I just checked in a better description.
C
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS A
Harry Putnam wrote:
HP> I've also had to edit a number of other rules score values so
HP> probably just got off on the wrong foot.
You're just not going to do a better job of optimizing scores than the GA will,
though you might be seeing some "unusual" email that's not paralleling the
corpus wel
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 the voices made Harry Putnam write:
> I tried a defaut setup first though and lots of stuff was coming thru
> that shouldn't.
I've got it at 4.5, which along with AWL removes 99% of SPAM with no false
positives (I used to just /dev/null along with autoreplies, but now I've be
Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> describe FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD Forged yahoo.com 'Received:' header found
>>
>> Comes no nearer to making it clear what is really happening.
>
> Hrm. This was reported once before, and I thought the description had
> been updated then. Sorry, I should
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Thanks, I guess it makes sense, but I have to say that reading the
> description:
> describe FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD Forged yahoo.com 'Received:' header found
>
> Comes no nearer to making it clear what is really happening.
Hrm. This was reported once befo
Harry, et al --
...and then Harry Putnam said...
%
% Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
%
% > On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Harry Putnam wrote:
% >
...
% >> FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD version=2.20
% >>
% >> Yet a grep of the received headers reveal no instance of yahoo.
% >
% > I'll answer since this ha
Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> This line appears in mail:
>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=2.2 required=2.0 tests=Repeat_Any_Allcap,\
>> FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD version=2.20
>>
>> Yet a grep of the received headers reveal no instance of yahoo.
>
>
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Harry Putnam wrote:
> This line appears in mail:
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=2.2 required=2.0 tests=Repeat_Any_Allcap,\
> FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD version=2.20
>
> Yet a grep of the received headers reveal no instance of yahoo.
I'll answer since this has come up before and I sugge
This line appears in mail:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=2.2 required=2.0 tests=Repeat_Any_Allcap,\
FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD version=2.20
Yet a grep of the received headers reveal no instance of yahoo.
It is from a yahoo.com user, but the message mentiones rec'd, not
from.
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
