RE: [SAtalk] Extending the AWL concepts to URIs found in Spam Bod y

2003-10-25 Thread Chris Santerre
> > * Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-23 21:19]: > > Alex Pleiner writes: > > > Wouldn't the URIs mentioned in Spam be good keys for some kind of > > > auto-whitelisting with a similar mechanism as for AWL? > > > They already are in SpamAssassin 2.60. They're tokenized heavily, > > and

Re: [SAtalk] Extending the AWL concepts to URIs found in Spam Bod y

2003-10-24 Thread Alex Pleiner
* Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-24 16:38]: > My theory is that an ABL (autoblacklist) or evilrules is very much worth it. > While Bayes will score the "Spammyness", a ABL or single rule will simply > add more points to known domains. The idea of evilrules was that if you got > one of

RE: [SAtalk] Extending the AWL concepts to URIs found in Spam Bod y

2003-10-24 Thread Chris Santerre
At first I didn't get what Alex was saying. Now I do! This is like an ABL instead of a AWL. Cool idea, only we use the spam host domains like evilrules. Alex also posted his new domain extractor using MIME::Parser; which should make something like this even easier. It could be fed like Bayes. Whe