* Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-24 16:38]:
> My theory is that an ABL (autoblacklist) or evilrules is very much worth it.
> While Bayes will score the "Spammyness", a ABL or single rule will simply
> add more points to known domains. The idea of evilrules was that if you got
> one of those domains, you might as well add 5 points because it is verified
> spam and won't be ham. (Unless I screwed it up ;)
And we would be prepared to use the collected domains for some other
methods, like publishing/distributing them (I can imaging a RBL- or
Razor-like system, maybe P2P-based) or setting up some "punish" mode
(like Graham suggested) in a not-so-far future.
> I'm *gulp* willing to look at code as well and play around. (Did I just say
> that?!)
I'm willing to help.
> Also, I'm still fighting for the people that can't use Bayes for some
> reason. There out there. HOld on guys, I'm pulling for ya! :-)
Yes, that's an important point.
Alex
--
Alex Pleiner
zeitform Internet Dienste Fraunhoferstrasse 5
64283 Darmstadt, Germany
http://www.zeitform.de Tel.: +49 (0)6151 155-635
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +49 (0)6151 155-634
GnuPG/PGP Key-ID: 0x613C21EA
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
