Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:44 AM
To: Mike Carlson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Email Not Caught
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Carlson
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk]
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Donovan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'll need to be enlightened on what BIGEVIL
> is .. is it really that simple .. drop the file into
> your SA folder?? or am I confussed ?
Drop it into the directory where your local.cf file lives (typically
/etc/mail/spamas
I'll need to be enlightened on what BIGEVIL is .. is it really that simple .. drop the
file into your SA folder ?? or am I confussed ?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Manage
At 12:21 PM 1/7/2004, Mike Carlson wrote:
I have a message that is not getting caught by the spam filter. In fact it
scores 0.0 if I look at the header. Why would the attached message not get
caught by the spam filters?
It gets caught on mine...
If I look at the message source in Outlook Expres
I am running 2.61. Are these rules not enabled or something? I cannot figure out why they are not getting caught.
--Mike
From: SethSent: Wed 1/7/2004 11:32 AMTo: Mike CarlsonCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Email Not Caught
These are the rules that it flagged on my 2.60
These are the rules that it flagged on my 2.60 installation:
HTML_MESSAGE
MIME_BASE64_LATIN
MIME_BASE64_TEXT
Seth
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 10:21, Mike Carlson wrote:
> I have a message that is not getting caught by the spam filter. In
> fact it scores 0.0 if I look at the header. Why would the atta
I have a message that is not getting caught by the spam filter. In fact it scores 0.0 if I look at the header. Why would the attached message not get caught by the spam filters?
If I look at the message source in Outlook Express is says it is Base64 Encoded. Could that be the problem? Is the
