I have a message that is not getting caught by the spam filter. In fact it scores 0.0 if I look at the header. Why would the attached message not get caught by the spam filters?
It gets caught on mine...
If I look at the message source in Outlook Express is says it is Base64 Encoded. Could that be the problem? Is there a way to test against that?
Base64 encoding is not a problem.. SA decodes base64 before running it's rules...
What is strange to me is that SA has a rule which detects if the message is base64 encoded, and those rules fired when I ran your message through...
I get these matches:
Content analysis details: (8.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.5 MIME_BASE64_LATIN RAW: Latin alphabet text using base64 encoding
1.0 MIME_BASE64_TEXT RAW: Message text disguised using base64 encoding
1.0 LOCAL_DRUGS_MALEDYSFUNCTION LOCAL_DRUGS_MALEDYSFUNCTIONnote: LOCAL_DRUGS_MALEDYSFUNCTION is one of my test rules, it looks for various forms of v-pills. I'll be making my "drugs" ruleset available sometime after it's stable.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
