I did notice the misspellings in the email but shouldn't it have scored it with *something*? It gave it a score of 0.0. That just seems very odd. Isn't there a rule for Base64 encoded emails?
--Mike -----Original Message----- From: Jennifer Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:44 AM To: Mike Carlson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Email Not Caught -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Carlson Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Email Not Caught I have a message that is not getting caught by the spam filter. In fact it scores 0.0 if I look at the header. Why would the attached message not get caught by the spam filters? Those were getting by me, and it took me a moment to see that only the first and last letters of the offending words are in place, and lazy minds (not to be offensive...maybe I should have said casually reading minds) psychologically fix the words, sometimes without even realizing you're doing it. I would guess this is going to be happening more and more. For now, I whipped up some rules to bump those up the rest of the way. You may want to increase the scores, I only needed this much more to tag them, and I tag at 7 (this week... my mood is a little better) <snip> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
