Jason Haar wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 01:42:13PM +0100, John Horne wrote:
>
>>I've started using the '-L' recently too, I think our exim MTA does enough
>>(?) network/DNS checks already. You may want to look at the '-S' option on
>>spamd as well :-)
>
>
> There was a thread a while back a
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 01:42:13PM +0100, John Horne wrote:
> I've started using the '-L' recently too, I think our exim MTA does enough
> (?) network/DNS checks already. You may want to look at the '-S' option on
> spamd as well :-)
There was a thread a while back about that not being a good ide
On 24-May-2002 at 12:06:08 j.linn wrote:
> This morning I noticed that the time to scan had suddenly increased from
> 0/1 sec to 4/5 sec. After much investigation the "-L" flag was set and the
> normal 0/1 was restored. Clearly some system called by spamd was down
> from about 7am [BST] this morni
This morning I noticed that the time to scan had suddenly increased from
0/1 sec to 4/5 sec. After much investigation the "-L" flag was set and the
normal 0/1 was restored. Clearly some system called by spamd was down
from about 7am [BST] this morning.
Is there a list of hosts called when running
