Jason Haar wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 01:42:13PM +0100, John Horne wrote: > >>I've started using the '-L' recently too, I think our exim MTA does enough >>(?) network/DNS checks already. You may want to look at the '-S' option on >>spamd as well :-) > > > There was a thread a while back about that not being a good idea until > the positive checks were done before the negative. Has that happened? If so, > would that actually save any time as the entire message would have to be > checked for positive tags anyway?
It's the negative tests first, and yes it's now done mostly properly. But yes, for non-spam email (or that which SA identifies as non-spam), all the tests get done anyway. Matt. _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
