Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Distribute the load
SpamTalk said:
> If the load is that large it would probably justify a hardware or
> dedicated software load-balancing solution. Doesn't Red hat appears to
> have an "active" load balancing solution:
&
SpamTalk said:
> If the load is that large it would probably justify a hardware or dedicated
> software load-balancing solution. Doesn't Red hat appears to have an
> "active" load balancing solution:
> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/advserver/RHLAS-2.1-Manual/install-guide/
> s1-lvs-schedulin
heel?
-Original Message-
From: Rich Puhek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:17 PM
To: Justin Mason
Cc: Ralf Hildebrandt; Mark M; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Distribute the load
True, spamd doesn't need much for state info, and each connection
True, spamd doesn't need much for state info, and each connection is
independent of other connections.
I was thinking along the lines of spamc trying to do the load-ballancing
by determining which server out of a list it should contact, as opposed
to having multiple IP addresses for an A-record
Rich Puhek said:
> The conceptual problem with doing round-robin spamd servers is that the
> mail server itself would have to maintain some state info to determine
> which spamd server it shoud contact (unless it randomly selected one).
> Given most implementations (procmail for lots of us), ma
At 09:28 AM 11/20/2002 -0600, you wrote:
Is there a way to round robin, using spamc/spamd
to have it use more then 1 spamd server
Ok, this is theoretical (in the sense that I've never done this before) and
I assume you have administrative rights to your domain's DNS servers, but:
According to
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:28:17 -0600
"Mark M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to round robin, using spamc/spamd
>
> to have it use more then 1 spamd server
You could hack spamc to support SRV records and load-balance
that way.
---
Lars Hansson
---
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Mark M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is there a way to round robin, using spamc/spamd
to have it use more then 1 spamd server
Yes. Have two identical servers, make them both MX for the internal
domain (same preference) and send mail to "internal.domain".
Well, that will w
* Mark M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Is there a way to round robin, using spamc/spamd
>
> to have it use more then 1 spamd server
Yes. Have two identical servers, make them both MX for the internal
domain (same preference) and send mail to "internal.domain".
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des R
Is there a way to round robin, using
spamc/spamd
to have it use more then 1 spamd
server
10 matches
Mail list logo
