Re: [SAtalk] Corrupt Header

2002-07-12 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 01:57:42PM -0400, Ryan Cleary wrote: > "ensure that this line is stripped" Ok, I think it's time to send in a patch that gets rid of this stuff once and for all. Let your delivery agent figure out about dealing with the From. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "A committee

Re: [SAtalk] Corrupt Header

2002-07-12 Thread Ryan Cleary
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > I found this out by changing the spamd options to have a "-F 0". > spamc gets called during procmail which promptly puts messages w/out > "From " lines in the last message of my inbox. I think spamassassin is stripping the From lines. From spamassas

Re: [SAtalk] Corrupt Header

2002-07-12 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:17:29PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > Although in thinking about it, people don't really use SA for delivery > any more, so we should probably just not add the From line and let > procmail (or insert your favorite program here) handle the From line. > Not my call thoug

Re: [SAtalk] Corrupt Header

2002-07-12 Thread Craig R . Hughes
I've long been of the philosophy that spamassassin should focus on exactly one thing: identification and tagging of spam. Leave the delivery to something which does delivery well. Leave the SMTP to something which does SMTP well. etc, etc, etc. I haven't chopped out the delivery stuff alto

Re: [SAtalk] Corrupt Header

2002-07-11 Thread Malte S. Stretz
On Thursday 11 July 2002 19:17 CET Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:08:40PM -0400, Vince Puzzella wrote: > > Thanks, that worked. BTW, what is it's purpose and why is it generated > > by default? Just curious. >[...] > > Although in thinking about it, people don't really use SA

RE: [SAtalk] Corrupt Header

2002-07-11 Thread Smart, Dan
riginal Message- |From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:17 PM |To: Vince Puzzella |Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Corrupt Header | | |On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:08:40PM -0400, Vince Puzzella wrote: |> Thanks, that worked. BTW, what is

Re: [SAtalk] Corrupt Header

2002-07-11 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:08:40PM -0400, Vince Puzzella wrote: > Thanks, that worked. BTW, what is it's purpose and why is it generated > by default? Just curious. Most people use mbox style mail folders, the "From " at the start of a line indicates a new message in the folder, so (indented):

RE: [SAtalk] Corrupt Header

2002-07-11 Thread Vince Puzzella
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 11:58 AM To: Vince Puzzella Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Corrupt Header On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:41:03AM -0400, Vince Puzzella wrote: > The screwedupmessage.txt file contains an additional line at the top > that breaks the header format. It look

Re: [SAtalk] Corrupt Header

2002-07-11 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:41:03AM -0400, Vince Puzzella wrote: > The screwedupmessage.txt file contains an additional line at the top > that breaks the header format. It looks like this: > > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED]Thu July 11 11:26:34 2002 > > This is corrupting our messages. Does anyone el

[SAtalk] Corrupt Header

2002-07-11 Thread Vince Puzzella
Title: Corrupt Header I'm in the process of integrating spamassassin with zmailer. After running: spamassassin -t < origmessage.txt > screwedupmessage.txt The screwedupmessage.txt file contains an additional line at the top that breaks the header format. It looks like this: From [EMAIL