> HS> are way too high - a lot of legitimate email gets flagged. I have
> HS> adjusted them for my system, but it might be nice to make spamassassin
> HS> less English centric out of the box.
>
> It is not English-centric. It is an RFC violation to have 8-bit
> characters there. Flagging RFC vio
tir, 2003-02-25 kl. 15:32 skrev Malte S. Stretz:
> Godwin's Law:
> "The probability of somebody drawing an inappropriate Nazi-comparison
> increases proportionally to the length of a Usenet thread. If this happens,
> the discussion is normally declared as ended and the one who drawed the
> comp
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 the voices made [EMAIL PROTECTED] write:
> Young whipper-snappers. When I started coding we had to enter code through
> front panel switches, and read our output on the console lights - and we
> had to replace at least three vacuum tubes per run. On the newest
> machines, we c
Is anybody experiencing rules not firing in the release of 2.50?
They seem to work in the CVS version I downloaded Feb 7
Regards
Greg
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible c
At Sat Feb 22 00:35:57 2003, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
>
> MR> It's just the shame that these users didn't contribute towards the
> MR> mass-checks.
>
> Yes, but you have to remember that people use SA to not have to waste time on
> spam, and most of them don't want to "waste" the time they're sa
"Tony L. Svanstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> not to forget, most of the users of SA wouldn't even
> know how to contribute even if they wanted to.
Indeed. And another thing: some SMTP servers and MUAs, which I use because
my customers use them, do not allow me to extract a spam message which
Daniel Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> But, do you send messages in Irish Gaelic? ;-)
I can't speak for Justin, but personally, I can only throw some umlauts
into the MUA alphabet soup. Gaelic is hard to top... :-)
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Dipl. Inform. Ralph Seichter
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) wrote:
> > Is SpamAssassin 2.50 testing for "real" 8-bit characters or
> > is it testing for quoted-printable / base64 encoded 8-bit
> > characters with a 7-bit representation? [...]
>
> The former.
I thought so, but I wanted to make sure.
> Unfortunately many MU
