On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Well, a copy-paste of some interpretation of the message by pine isn't
> really going to give us much useful information to go on.
> However, I'd venture to guess that the MIME construction is of a nature
> which confuses SA.. For example, a bug that was
At 12:39 AM 10/14/03 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
Is there something about the windows charset that throws off the recipe?
Or are they using 'high bit' to invalidate the regex?
Well, a copy-paste of some interpretation of the message by pine isn't
really going to give us much useful information t
Hi!
I've got a rule (SA 2.44) that looks like this:
body LOC_DOCTORB /our doctors will write.*prescription/i
I've seen it work a few times, so the syntax is okay. But today it did not
match on the following (excuse the full headers,but they might give a
clue):
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
