Re: [SAtalk] Blacklist To problem

2003-08-19 Thread Walter S. Arnold
At 09:07 AM 8/18/03 -0700, Patrick Morris wrote: > >This option no longer exists. I used to use it myself, but after it was >gone I realized it was a lot more efficient to stop them before they get >to SA (in my case, by having Sendmail reject mail to invalid accounts). Ok, did that, it works w

Re[2]: [SAtalk] Blacklist To problem

2003-08-18 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Fred, Monday, August 18, 2003, 12:35:21 PM, you wrote: F> blacklist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] F> I too need this feature for the same reason. F> Spammers decided to send to random names at my domain and I was using F> a catchall account, since they

Re: [SAtalk] Blacklist To problem

2003-08-18 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:35 PM 8/18/2003 -0400, Fred I-IS.COM wrote: According to the current online docs: blacklist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If the given address appears as a recipient in the message headers (Resent-To, To, Cc, obvious envelope receipient, etc,) the mail will be blacklisted. Same format as blacklist

Re: [SAtalk] Blacklist To problem

2003-08-18 Thread Fred I-IS.COM
, Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. - Original Message - From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Walter S. Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:04 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Blacklis

Re: [SAtalk] Blacklist To problem

2003-08-18 Thread Matt Kettler
At 09:07 AM 8/18/2003 -0500, Walter S. Arnold wrote: The blacklist_to entries in user_prefs aren't working. Looking through the list of tests at http://spamassassin.org/tests.html I see the following three tests: There is no such configuration option, so of course they aren't working :) ---

Re: [SAtalk] Blacklist To problem

2003-08-18 Thread Jim Knuth
> > blacklist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > of course also blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and so on --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals,

Re: [SAtalk] Blacklist To problem

2003-08-18 Thread Patrick Morris
This option no longer exists. I used to use it myself, but after it was gone I realized it was a lot more efficient to stop them before they get to SA (in my case, by having Sendmail reject mail to invalid accounts). Walter S. Arnold wrote: This is quite different from blacklist_from as I unde

Re: [SAtalk] Blacklist To problem

2003-08-18 Thread Walter S. Arnold
At 05:35 PM 8/18/03 +0200, Jim Knuth wrote: > >Hello Walter, >The answer is: > >blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm trying to blacklist_to There are several addresses on my domains which we have never used but which receive lots of spams. Those are [EMAIL PROTECTED] which spammers invented and a

Re: [SAtalk] Blacklist To problem

2003-08-18 Thread Jim Knuth
Hello Walter, - Original Message - From: "Walter S. Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:07 PM Subject: [SAtalk] Blacklist To problem > The blacklist_to entries in user_prefs aren't working. > > Looki

[SAtalk] Blacklist To problem

2003-08-18 Thread Walter S. Arnold
The blacklist_to entries in user_prefs aren't working. Looking through the list of tests at http://spamassassin.org/tests.html I see the following three tests: USER_IN_BLACKLIST USER_IN_WHITELIST USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO However, there is no "user_in_blacklist_to" listed on that page. Was it acci