At 04:09 PM 8/20/2003 -0400, K Old wrote:
Can anyone offer advice on this? Any good arguments I can bring to the
table against getting the appliance?
You'd really have to be specific as to which appliance..
I've seen a lot of products out there (ie: trend's "sensitive content"
blocker) which bl
On Wednesday, August 20, 2003, at 02:09 PM, K Old wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've been using SA for at least a year or two now and love it! We
> combine it with MailScanner with ClamAV and out of 20,000 emails per
> week receive no viruses and block out around 4,000 pieces of
> spam.and r
On Wednesday, August 20, 2003, at 02:09 PM, K Old wrote:
My problem is the IT Director loves SA too, but is wanting to purchase
one of the Spam Appliances that handles all the updating, etc. for a
fee. I can't see that it would be a wise investment as the appliances
are at least $1500 and yearly
-Original Message-
From: Chad Leigh
> I've been using SA for at least a year or two now and love it! We
> combine it with MailScanner with ClamAV and out of 20,000 emails per
> week receive no viruses and block out around 4,000 pieces of
> spam.and really only about 100 pieces of sp
On Wednesday, August 20, 2003, at 02:09 PM, K Old wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've been using SA for at least a year or two now and love it! We
combine it with MailScanner with ClamAV and out of 20,000 emails per
week receive no viruses and block out around 4,000 pieces of
spam.and really only ab
Hello everyone,
I've been using SA for at least a year or two now and love it! We
combine it with MailScanner with ClamAV and out of 20,000 emails per
week receive no viruses and block out around 4,000 pieces of
spam.and really only about 100 pieces of spam slip through the
cracks. I think t
